Some things I said in my last post deserve further explanation. While you have to 'suck corporate cock' to get things published, this doesn't mean what we get is bad. If what we receive isn't palatable then it won't sell. So there has to be some quality and polish to what's released. It's just that this 'quality and polish' sometimes takes the form of censorship and filtering. If people in business suits with spreadsheets are making decisions that affect creativity, then something will be lost. But I'm sure I'm only explaining things that everyone knows already.